The program Zotero is, hands-down, the best Free Software academic reference management tool. As such, it is indispensable for academics who want to remain in control of their own means of production. It works together very well with LibreOffice and it’s quite doable to create any citation style that is not yet available in its big library.
Since recently, I have also begun to use its note-taking features, as it is quite convenient to have notes directly attached to references in its library; especially as you can then also share them in groups, etc. However, one downside is that the note-taking interface is slow – and by slow, I mean that it often takes up to 10 seconds for a key press to appear on the screen. In addition, the custom note-taking interface does not allow me to make use of the years of muscle memory for the vim commands that I have acquired.
As I found out now, there’s a wonderful tool called zotero-cli which lets you manage your notes from the command line.
Installation is easy (once you have pip installed):
sudo pip install zotero-cli
Once installed and provisioned with a Zotero API key, you can choose your favorite editor by setting the VISUAL environment variable (gvim -f in my case), and take advantage of all the advanced features that you are used to, like this:
Update: 21 November 2016 – I now recommend Riot (which is based on Matrix) as the best encrypted messenger, as it has similar security to Wire / Signal and it is decentralized, making users independent from any particular provider.
The encrypted messaging app Wire recently open-sourced its client code. Wire is a very well-made messenger with many more features than Signal; and it has end-to-end encrypted multi-party audio calls and video chats which makes it a useful addition to Signal and other encrypted messengers. While they offer desktop apps for Windows and OS X for download, no packaged apps exist for Linux. In this post, I will briefly explain how to create an installable Ubuntu package of the Wire desktop app.
It has to be said, first, that the Wire client code is no Free Software – it does not allow for all the rights that go with genuine open source licenses –, the server is still closed-source, and there is no decentralization. In these respects, I am still putting my hopes on Matrix, once they’ve implemented end-to-end encryption, to provide a more usable and more open form of messaging and group calls.
But until that happens, Wire might be the only usable Skype alternative for someone like me who has to participate regularly in group calls as part of my job. Signal does not have group call functionality and programs like Tox and Ring are not usable enough for recommending them to less technically inclined colleagues. They also don’t have mobile versions that are ready for everyday use.
Thus, for people who want to leave Skype for a more secure alternative, Wire is very attractive. However, for Linux users, the only option so far has been to login via the Wire web app (which defeats the point of end-to-end encryption to some extent).
As Wire has now published the source code for its desktop app, it is really easy to create a .deb package for Ubuntu.
After having done this, you have to perform the following steps:
git clone https://github.com/wireapp/wire-desktop.git
electron-installer-debian --src wrap/build/Wire-linux-x64 --dest wrap/installers/ --arch amd64
This will leave you (if everything works) with a .deb file in the wrap/installers directory that you then can install with sudo dpkg -i wrap/installers/*.deb. Afterwards, you will can start the desktop app with /usr/share/wireinternal/Wire. For some reason, it does not get added to the desktop menu, but under Unity you can pin it to your quick start panel once you have started it once manually.~~
I will give a short lecture titled “Why mass surveillance is wrong even if you have nothing to hide” at the Groningen Night of Philosophy tonight (room 4, 9.30p.m.). The event is unfortunately already sold out, but if you have tickets, please drop in!
Although Adorno has the reputation of being highly abstract, anyone who has at least read Minima Moralia knows that this reputation is not justified – Adorno quite often uses small details of daily life to explain how the totality of social relations can be discovered by looking at such details.
Next to his more famous publications, two smaller and less well-known essays are quite interesting in this regard:
How to look at television (link goes to JSTOR) is a 1954 publication, based on the research on mass culture Adorno did in the United States:
Every spectator of a television mystery knows with absolute certainty how it is going to end. Tension is but superficially maintained and is unlikely to have a serious effect any more. On the contrary, the spectator feels on safe ground all the time. This longing for “feeling on safe ground”-reflecting an infantile need for protection, rather than his desire for a thrill-is catered to. The element of excitement is preserved only with tongue in cheek. Such changes fall in line with the potential change from a freely competitive to a virtually “closed” society into which one wants to be admitted or from which one fears to be rejected. Everything somehow appears “predestined.”
Literary dilettantes can be recognized by their desire to connect everything. Their products hook sentences together with logical connectives even though the logical relationship asserted by those connectives does not hold. To the person who cannot truly conceive anything as a unit, anything that suggests disintegration or discontinuity is unbearable; only a person who can grasp totality can understand caesuras. But the dash provides instruction in them. In the dash, thought becomes aware of its fragmentary character. It is no accident that in the era of the progressive degeneration of language, this mark of punctuation is neglected precisely insofar as it fulfills its function: when it separates things that feign a connection. All the dash claims to do now is to prepare us in a foolish way for surprises that by that very token are no longer surprising.
These observations can also be useful when reading philosophy papers!
Peerio is especially useful for sharing large files – something that is often difficult via email or requires using insecure services like Dropbox. It also has group chat functionality and it is – compared to alternatives like PGP and OTR – very easy to use for computer novices. It works, however, only with an account on Peerio’s central server and thus potentially leaks meta-data (and makes you depend on a commercial entity). It is also less established than PGP and OTR and its security promises should therefore be treated skeptically, especially as most users will not be able to check updates for correspondence with the source code. It allows one to have much more private conversations than most other popular apps, though, and therefore might be a good compromise to use for communications with people who do not have the skills and time for more advanced solutions.
If you’re interested in using Peerio, my user name is tstahl and my cryptographic identity (a so-called “MiniLock key”) is D4wYAnKrcrEXWu7tZdpV8mULB8fvNguYymHu3Z6GjMDjN. If you use this referral link, you also get 250MB extra storage space.
Recent disclosures suggest that many governments apply indiscriminate mass surveillance technologies that allow them to capture and store a massive amount of communications data belonging to citizens and non-citizens alike. This article argues that traditional liberal critiques of government surveillance that center on an individual right to privacy cannot completely capture the harm that is caused by such surveillance because they ignore its distinctive political dimension. As a complement to standard liberal approaches to privacy, the article develops a critique of surveillance that focuses on the question of political power in the public sphere.
The article is published under an Open Access license.
A highly interesting analysis on Current Affairs that argues not from preference, but from a quite convincing analysis of the facts regarding Clinton.
recently, everything about the electability calculus has changed, due to one simple fact: Donald Trump is likely to be the Republican nominee for President. Given this reality, every Democratic strategic question must operate not on the basis of abstract electability against a hypothetical candidate, but specific electability against the actual Republican nominee, Donald Trump.
Here, a Clinton match-up is highly likely to be an unmitigated electoral disaster, whereas a Sanders candidacy stands a far better chance. Every one of Clinton’s (considerable) weaknesses plays to every one of Trump’s strengths, whereas every one of Trump’s (few) weaknesses plays to every one of Sanders’s strengths. From a purely pragmatic standpoint, running Clinton against Trump is a disastrous, suicidal proposition.
I recommend to read the whole thing. Given the high likelihood that Clinton will win the nomination, it is pretty depressing.